Conditions to be satisfied before Whistle Blowing

Jacob
1 Min Read
Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. I only recommend products or services that I personally use and believe will add value to my readers. Your support is appreciated!

Richard T. De George suggests the following:

1.   The harm that will be done by the product to the public is serious and considerable.

2.   The individual makes his/her concern known to his/her superiors

3.   If one does not get any proper response from immediate superiors, then one should exhaust the channels that are available within the organization including the board of directors.

4.   One must have documented evidence that would convince a reasonable and impartial

observer that one’s view of the situation is correct and the company policy is wrong.

5.   There must be strong evidence that making the information public will in fact prevent the threatened serious harm.

Share This Article
Inspiring the world through Personal Development and Entrepreneurship. Experimenter in life, productivity, and creativity. Work in SenseCentral.
Leave a review