CONTRASTS WITH STANDARD EXPERIMENTS

Jacob
0 Min Read
Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. I only recommend products or services that I personally use and believe will add value to my readers. Your support is appreciated!

1. EXPERIMENTAL CONTROL: In standard experiments, members are in two different groups.  Members  of one  group  receive  special  experimental  treatment.  The  other  group members, called ‘control group’ do not receive special treatment, though they are from the same environment in all other respects.

But  this  is not  true  in engineering,  since  most  of  the  experiments  are  not  conducted  in laboratories.   The   subjects   of   experiments   are   human   beings   who   are   outside   the experimenter’s control.

Thus it is not possible to study the effects of changes in variable on different groups. Hence only historical and retrospective data available about various target groups has to be used for evaluation. Hence engineering as a social experimentation seems to be an extended usage of the concept of experimentation.

2. INFORMED CONSENT: has two elements, knowledge and voluntariness. The subjects (human beings) should be given all the information needed to make a reasonable decision. Next, they must get into the experiment without being subjected to force, fraud or deception. Supplying complete information  is neither  necessary  nor  in most  cases  possible.  But all relevant  information  needed  for  making  a reasonable  decision  on whether  to  participate should be conveyed. Generally, we all prefer to be the subject of our own experiments rather than those of somebody else.

Share This Article
Inspiring the world through Personal Development and Entrepreneurship. Experimenter in life, productivity, and creativity. Work in SenseCentral.
Leave a review